Friday, August 8, 2025

Travel Log Day 3: Myeongdong Cathedral

Thursday, August 7, 2025

The Lighthouse Diary Entry #77: Libraries as Partners in Becoming

Our week long library orientation closes in a few days. Facilitating the learning and acquisition of literacy skills through the library is always a big challenge. By high school, students have reached a point of view and a perception of the library as a place to soak in the aircon, which it is. And with the erratic changes in weather, this reason for going to the library can be taken advantage of. So, we persist.

This academic year, we focus on understanding what knowledge is and use the necessary skills to deconstruct, construct, unpack and pare its complexities. We begin by exploring choices and the decisions that shape how we seek, validate, and share information. This year’s orientation invites students to reimagine the library not just as a cooling space, but as a thinking space—one where inquiry, reflection, and responsibility converge.




Whether it’s through browsing databases, questioning sources, citing with integrity, or embracing stories that challenge their worldview, we want our students to see the library as a partner in their becoming. In a world brimming with noise, the library remains a place where discernment matters, and every question is a step toward deeper understanding.

Tuesday, August 5, 2025

Cyanotype Prints and Pottery: Working With the Elements

Friday, August 1, 2025

New Book: Planting a Tree of Hope

Sunday, July 27, 2025

When Lea Salonga Said “I am a BTS Fangirl”: On Loving BTS, Fandom Identity, and the Weight of Belonging

I felt something in me stir. Joy, at first. Pride. The validation that comes when someone of her stature recognizes what many of us have long known: BTS is not “just another boy band.” They transcend genre, language, and category. They are movement, message, and meaning. But then I noticed something missing.
She didn’t say, “I am ARMY.”
And for those of us who live and breathe this identity, that difference matters. I did not feel offended. It wasn’t even disappointment. It was more like, alertness. A flicker of awareness that words hold weight, especially when spoken by public figures. Especially in fandom culture, where naming yourself is not just self-expression, but also a declaration of participation.
And Ms. Lea, gracefully and respectfully, chose not to declare. A very wise decision and gesture.
“BTS Fangirl” is Personal. “ARMY” is Communal. There is a quiet but powerful distinction between saying, “I’m a fan of BTS.” And “I am ARMY.”
The first is individual, even intimate. The second is a call to belonging. It ties you into a global network of memory, labor, joy, defense, and shared meaning-making. And perhaps Ms. Lea, in all her wisdom, knew that.
To be ARMY is not casual. It is not a trend. It is:
• Streaming with purpose.
• Voting with coordination.
• Staying through hiatuses, military enlistments, and misunderstood eras.
• Creating, curating, and caring not just for BTS, but for each other.
And maybe that’s why Ms. Lea didn’t claim it. Not because she isn’t sincere in her admiration, but because she understands that ARMY isn’t just a word. It’s devotion and a commitment.
I appreciate that she showed restraint. That refusal to casually claim what she hasn’t fully lived is a form of respect. Life is life-ing as it goes. And perhaps all she can do for now is truly appreciate, adore and go gaga over RPWP and the rest of the solo albums of BTS she mentioned in the interview. She is a BTS fan, and I love her for it.

In fandom, ethics exist and love can hold without appropriation. In a fandom ecosystem where parasocial intimacy is often mistaken for personal possession, and stan culture can pressure public figures into performative allegiance, Lea’s choice feels intentional and purposeful.
She loves BTS. That’s clear. She supports their work. That’s beautiful. But she didn’t insert herself into ARMY spaces with the entitlement of someone who has “earned” that title. This is admirable. In doing so, she models how to honor a group’s impact without overstepping the boundary of lived experiences of ARMY, collective or individual.
However, there are comments that missed this point. Someone responded on socmed to Lea’s quote by saying:
“She obviously hasn’t met this and that Kpop group yet.”
And that’s when my ache surfaced. Because the comment didn’t just suggest she was missing out. It subtly implied that her love for BTS was less valid, incomplete, even, simply because the comment hadn’t spread that love wider.
To those commenting with a multistan agenda, my question is this: what if depth matters more than width?
What if staying loyal to one group, through all their seasons is not about being closed off, but about being rooted? Not exclusion but grounding.
For some of us, BTS holds a sacred space in our lives. You may think of this as cultish but, no. What I mean is philosophical aesthetics. More on this in future posts.
BTS didn’t just catch our attention. They caught us in our grief, our becoming, our quiet hours of self-doubt. For fans like me, BTS is not just a band to admire. They are:
• The ones who held us.
• The voices that named what we couldn’t say.
• The bridge that connected us to generations past and present, thus, creating an intergenerational understanding.
• The reason we created, healed, and chose to stay.
To be ARMY is not simply to love BTS. It is to let that love shape your life. The thing is, there are many ways to be a fan.
I wrote and developed this essay not to draw borders or demarcation lines. Not exclusion. Not hate. Not elitism.
It’s about respecting thresholds. Recognizing differences and respecting it with transparency and “relational accountability”. You can be a casual listener, a dedicated fangirl, a multistan, a curious observer and all of those identities are valid.




But if you see someone not claiming ARMY, even when they clearly love BTS, maybe pause before assuming they’re lacking or anything else. Maybe, like Ms. Lea, they’re showing us what fandom ethics can look like: Loving fully, while knowing when not to claim what isn’t yours.
In the end, I don’t need Lea Salonga to say she’s ARMY. Her admiration is enough and it’s hers. And as for me? I’ll say it again and again:
I am ARMY. Not because I stan. But because I stayed. Because BTS met me first and those seven amazing artists never let me go. In the rhythm of that love, I reclaimed who I am at the autumn of my life. That despite this season of fall, Spring Day has stayed. It will never leave me, nor I.
I close this essay by saying that I have fully understood that one person who abandoned me and became a multistan. I can now look at a cohort of fans of BTS and smile at the way they fangirl. Because, that is who they are. As for me, with my ARMY Glow Up projects in full swing this year, and my AGU certificate of commitment offered at the old Big Hit Building, as witnessed by my ARMY Daughter and Tita ARMY friends last June 10, 2025, I have fully healed. In the end, Ms. Lea’s restraint helped me name my own belonging. I am not just a BTS fangirl. I am ARMY by experience, by acts of creation, by choice.
Thank you Ms. Lea Salonga, for your class and grace; your candor and love for music and BTS. Your interview and what you particularly said about fangirling was illuminating.
Thank you, BTS! Thank you, ARMY!
Apobangpo! Purple and true!

Love, Liminality and Our Version of True ARMYing

 

Saturday, July 26, 2025

When Presence Feels Like a Gift: Navigating Ethics in Fandom Sharing

When BTS members Namjoon, Hoseok, and Yoongi recently attended the wedding of their longtime stylist, the moment resonated with ARMY. It was our first time to see our Rap Line Kings in one frame. Besides, it was not staged or publicized, but precisely because it was real. A quiet gesture of loyalty, friendship and affection. Namjoon gave a heartfelt speech recorded on video by a fan-guest probably. He even shared photos on his IG story. Then the deluge of photos and video clips from guests and fans.

As these images circulated, a thoughtful question arose: How is this different from the airport or vacation photos that fans often condemn as stalkerish or invasive?

Both involve public sharing. Both involve BTS. But the intention, context, and ethics behind them are worlds apart.

Let’s unpack this moment through a fan’s lens, with care.

💜 Consent Is the Cornerstone
Namjoon posted about the wedding. Namjoon gave us a clue and chose to let us in, if only briefly and on a private yet meaningful occasion. In doing so, he gave what we might call tacit consent. The images ARMYs reposted were celebratory and respectful, not sneaky or exploitative.
Contrast this with the photos taken at airports or on personal vacations: BTS isn’t posting. They’re not performing. They’re just being there, often exhausted, vulnerable, or on personal time. Such moments, when snapped and spread without consent, cross the line from admiration into surveillance.

✨ Presence is not permission. Just because someone is visible does not mean they are public property.

💜 The Spirit of the Share: Celebration vs. Consumption
There’s a difference between:
• Participating in a shared, affirming moment (like reposting wedding photos taken with affection), and
• Consuming content for clout or curiosity, without regard for the subject’s agency or humanity.

Wedding content felt like the former. It was relational. Rooted in care. Namjoon’s words at the wedding weren’t meant to go viral, but in the short clip shared by someone present, there was love, responsibility, and tenderness. It wasn’t stolen; it was witnessed.

On the other hand, vacation and airport paparazzi photos often strip away the idol’s voice. They commodify presence, feeding a content-hungry machine. Even if shared by fellow fans, the tone shifts from celebratory to possessive. From “with” to “at”.

💜Cultural and Fandom Contexts Matter
In Korean culture, weddings are sacred community events. This wasn’t just an errand or a pit stop. It was the wedding of a long-trusted stylist, someone who’s been with BTS through transformations and triumphs. Their presence spoke volumes: about loyalty, about found family, about being rooted in gratitude.

ARMY picked up on that. The mood online wasn’t “Look, I caught them!” It was “How beautiful it is that they showed up like this.”

When fans treat BTS sightings especially uninvited ones as trophies or conquests, we ignore that idols have the right to disappear, to breathe without cameras. That’s where fan culture needs to evolve, I think.

💜A Gentle Guide for Thoughtful Sharing
Whether you’re a seasoned ARMY or new to the fandom, here are five reflection questions to guide us all when sharing choices:
1. Did BTS (or their staff) share or signal willingness to share this moment? If yes, repost with care. If not, think twice.
2. Does this uplift the member or intrude on their privacy?
3. Would I feel proud showing this post to them face-to-face?
4. Am I sharing out of love, or just to be first?
5. Does this add warmth to the community, or stir controversy, gossip, or discomfort?
💜 Because We’re Building Something Bigger
BTS didn’t just give us music. They gave us a model for intentional living. They remind us, again and again, that love is not passive. It is mindful. And fandom at its best, is a space of relational ethics, not just emotional attachment.

So when we ask, “What makes this different?” the answer is not about the photo itself. It’s about how we hold space for others, even when they’re global stars. The wedding was a glimpse of something sacred and our Leader Nim invited us to see it. That’s a gift.

May we remain fans who know the difference.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...